MANUAL ESCALATION AFTER SCREENING

Sanctions screening after an alert: assess the match and ownership exposure.

Sanctions screening after an alert: assess the match and ownership exposure.

Sanctions screening after an alert: assess the match and ownership exposure.

Wehron turns a specific database alert into a documented factual basis. Identity, source script, name variants, ownership and control are assessed for the individual case. Wehron does not provide bulk screening or ongoing KYC monitoring.

Wehron turns a specific database alert into a documented factual basis. Identity, source script, name variants, ownership and control are assessed for the individual case. Wehron does not provide bulk screening or ongoing KYC monitoring.

Abstract Wehron data network for sanctions screening and ownership assessment

INITIAL ASSESSMENT

Three non-sensitive information blocks are enough to start.

01 Database alert and list version

02 Source name, aliases and known identifiers

03 Company, jurisdiction, decision and reference date

FROM ALERT TO FACTUAL BASIS

A database alert, match resolution and exposure are three separate questions.

A database alert, match resolution and exposure are three separate questions.

A screening system initially identifies a potential match. Only a comparison of source-script names, aliases, identity attributes, registry data and ownership or control links shows what the alert supports in the specific case. A non-match does not automatically answer the question of indirect connections or remaining open points.

WEHRON / BOUNDARY

Sanctions exposure as factual research

Wehron documents identity, ownership and control links, source status and open points. The client and its advisers determine whether a legal ownership or control rule applies and what legal consequence follows.

YOUR DELIVERABLE

A reviewable match and exposure file.

A reviewable match and exposure file.

01

Identity and name-variant matrix

Source-script names, aliases, documented transliterations, known identifiers and substantiated differences are set out in a structured comparison.

02

Ownership and control links

Shareholdings, roles, indicators of control and connected companies are assembled from the primary sources actually available.

03

List version, search trail and limitations

The list version, access dates, search variants, evidence status, single-source findings and remaining open points are stated explicitly.

DOCUMENTED PROCESS

From alert to a reviewable assessment.

From alert to a reviewable assessment.

01

Secure the alert and define the question

Record the system, list version, displayed match, available identifiers, jurisdiction and decision context.

02

Assess source script and identity

Source spellings, transliterations, aliases and stable identifiers are compared with registry and company links.

03

Separate match, exposure and limitations

Evidenced matches, substantiated differences, ownership or control links and unresolved uncertainties are documented separately.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Concise, transparent answers.

Concise, transparent answers.

What happens after an inconclusive database alert?

The alert is recorded and assessed against source-script names, name variants, identity attributes, registry information and ownership or control links. The outcome separates evidenced matches, substantiated differences and open points.

Does a non-match automatically mean there is no concern?

No. A non-match initially relates to the documented list comparison. Indirect ownership, control or other exposure links may require additional factual research.

What does Wehron expressly not provide?

Wehron does not provide bulk or ongoing KYC monitoring, issue legal sanctions clearance, or contact research subjects or human sources. Legal assessment and the resulting decision remain with the client and its advisers.

NEXT STEP

Discuss an inconclusive alert without sharing case details.

Discuss an inconclusive alert without sharing case details.

For the initial assessment, the system and list version, company and jurisdiction, decision context and desired timing are sufficient. Please do not send names, documents or case files at this stage. We will review your enquiry personally and respond with an assessment of fit and the appropriate next step.

Discuss the research question